Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Community Health ; 46(5): 913-917, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2260104

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic first became evident at the end of 2019, and because of the many unknown aspects of this emerging infectious disease, the internet quickly became a source of information for consumers. It is important for any vital information to be written unambiguously, and at a level that can be understood by all people regardless of education levels. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of 50 sources of COVID19 testing information online. Only 6 websites out of 50 received an appropriate readability score on more than one assessment. One-sample, one-tailed t-tests (α = 0.05, df = 49) were used to see if the websites with information on COVID-19 testing are being written at appropriate reading levels. The resulting p-values indicate that each p-value recorded is substantially below 0.05, it is very unlikely that websites on this topic are being written at the recommended levels. Even the optimal messages on COVID-19 reflect a confusing and rapidly changing public health crisis, however if messages are kept simple and clear, individuals will have the best possible chance of optimizing behavioral mitigation strategies. These are compelling reasons for informational hosts to take necessary steps to ensure that messages are written in as simple terms as possible. To this end, it is suggested that internet sites dispersing COVID-19 testing information build in text analysis methods for all published messages, particularly those meant to inform best health practices in the time of a pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/prevention & control , Comprehension , Health Literacy , Internet , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 16(4): 1317, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1152757
3.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 14(5): 635-637, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-208996

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of information on the Internet posted about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to determine how closely these materials are written to the recommended reading levels. METHODS: Using the search term "coronavirus," information posted on the first 100 English language websites was identified. Using an online readability calculator, multiple readability tests were conducted to ensure a comprehensive representation would result. RESULTS: The mean readability scores ranged between grade levels 6.2 and 17.8 (graduate school level). Four of the 5 measures (GFI, CLI, SMOG, FRE) found that readability exceeded the 10th grade reading level indicating that the text of these websites would be difficult for the average American to read. The mean reading level for nearly all noncommercial and commercial websites was at or above the 10th grade reading level. CONCLUSIONS: Messages about COVID-19 must be readable at an "easy" level, and must contain clear guidelines for behavior. The degree to which individuals seek information in response to risk messages is positively related to the expectation that the information will resolve uncertainty. However, if the information is too complex to interpret and it fails to lead to disambiguation, this can contribute to feelings of panic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Literacy/standards , Public Health/methods , COVID-19/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Literacy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internet/instrumentation , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Public Health/standards , Social Media/standards , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL